|
|
|
|
October 20, 2001 October 12 Tracking terror funds is the main event While all the news reporters watch and report on every bright flash of light, every loud explosion, why arent they covering with equal ferocity the war on terrorist finances? Like any organization, the far-flung network of terrorists needs money to function. Who is reporting and watching whether our government is going after their stock accounts, banks and trading companies with an equal ferocity that we launch jets with big bombs? The terrorists hit the World Trade Center because it is a symbol of the global economy. So, lets give them what they want; lets unplug them from their money. Responsible journalism should keep watch that Bushs war on terrorism is being fought where the action is and not just focus on watching rubble bounce. Afghanistan is a side show. How about reporting on the main event? BRUCE JOFFE PIEDMONT
October 12 However, it is the reading publics right and duty to react to those opinions. Given a strong enough public outcry, a cartoonist or editor might find himself with no readers, hence no job, hence no income. In my opinion, Sept. 11 is a rallying point for this country. And like it or not, for better or worse, George Bush is the leader around which the country must rally. His response to the tragedy has won praise from both sides of the aisle in Congress and the general public. The U.S. response against Afghanistan is unique in history, in that the targets are identified military targets and the bombing is accompanied by care packages dropped to help the general population. To suggest that President Bushs actions are taken to bolster declining popularity ratings or to offset failed domestic policy is asinine. Sept. 11 suddenly made all of this nations petty problems, including presidential approval ratings, vanish. President Bush could have carpet-bombed the whole Mideast the following week and he would have received tremendous popular support. However, he chose a reasoned, rational response to a hideous act that cried out for response. I was never impressed with either candidate, but President Bush has certainly proven himself capable of leading the country in this time of crisis. JOHN SKINNER WATSONVILLE
October 12 Weve all been exposed to news reports explaining that the first signs of anthrax are similar to a simple flu virus. Weve also heard anthrax is rapidly fatal, if not treated with antibiotics early. In fact, the treatment would have to be started even before the symptoms began to protect the person from serious disease and death. The use of antibiotics for anthrax is largely prophylactic for those people with a known exposure to the bacteria. Once the symptoms begin, its probably too late to help. What concerns me, as a health-care provider, is that many fearful people might stock up on antibiotics, intending to take them at the first sign of a sniffle. Since those sniffles will invariably wind up being just another cold or other minor illness, by taking unnecessary antibiotics they are contributing to a far greater public health problem: antibiotic-resistant bacteria. We must not succumb to public hysteria, as this will lead to many unintentional adverse consequences. What is the health-care community doing to help mitigate a possible biologic disaster? Were educating ourselves about the potential biologic weapons agents, their symptoms and treatment. Were also establishing communication links with the local public health office as well as with the state Department of Health Services for early reporting of suspicious cases. Unfortunately, until we have a documented case or cases of a potential biologic-weapon disease, we cant do anything differently than we would normally. So with flu season just around the corner, please get your flu shot and dont rush off to the doctor at the first sign of a cold or cough expecting to be treated for anthrax. JOHN FUST, MD CHAIRMAN, DISASTER PREPAREDNESS COMMITTEE, DOMINICAN HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT SANTA CRUZ
October 11 Having led many service projects in the past, I know firsthand that Ralphs exemplifies a model of collaboration, selflessness and tolerance by which we all should fashion our lives, and in promoting the values of a moral community, Ralphs makes every effort to espouse a plethora of nonprofit organizations and community-service projects. CalPIRG views the enrichment of community as emanating from the compassion and action of its citizens, and on behalf of CalPIRG and other nonprofit organizations throughout our community, I wish to thank Ralphs for its continued dedication to helping those who are less fortunate. I encourage everyone to support Ralphs, knowing it continues to champion a wide range of humanitarian causes. STEVEN WEISS SANTA CRUZ
October 12 On a day where we have declared war on terrorism, my heart bleeds for the innocent people of Afghanistan. This fireworks display makes a mockery of their suffering and pain, and I am deeply ashamed and embarrassed to be led by people numb and ignorant to the agonies of war. The very sounds I am hearing are striking fear into the hearts of millions of women, children and men who are at this very moment fleeing from the danger that these sounds represent. That we can call this entertainment today indicates a lack of local responsibility for the actions of our countrys leadership. At a time when Americans are being praised for their so-called unity, we are ostracizing many factions of our society based on the very thing we seem to value religious freedom and individuality. I am shocked by the reactions of many Americans to the tragic attack of Sept. 11, and saddened by the inability to learn deeper lessons for the future of the children of our country. When will we be able to unify across our differences? When will we become able to see ourselves in the faces of the women and children depicted in the devastating images on television? Until then, we are as responsible in perpetuating hate and in- tolerance as the terrorists we seek to destroy. Can we not unify across borders, races, nationalities and religions? KERRIN MURPHY SANTA CRUZ
October 12 The citizens of the United States need not worry about terrorist attacks from biological or chemical warfare. Our great leader refused to let our country join approximately 178 other nations in abolishing the manufacture and use of these monstrous causes of death so he undoubtedly knew something the rest of the world did not know. And I trust any reader of this letter will realize its written tongue in cheek. ROBYN NAYYAR AROMAS
October 12 My feeling is that if you do not love this country, you do not really belong here. You do have the right to express your opinions, but so do I, and I think you are a coward to wait until everyone has gone to bed, steal a flag and burn it. I feel sorry for you. Someone bought your rights with their blood under this flag. NORMA HADLAND SANTA CRUZ
October 12 PETER COOK SANTA CRUZ
October 12 One has only to look at the titles in their library, or to attend one of the numerous discussions about the Middle East, to understand the centers philosophy. I recently heard a speaker there say that violence was the only way for the Palestinians to achieve their goals against Israel, and not one of the centers supporters, including Scott Kennedy, its director, raised a voice in protest. STEVE GARDNER SANTA CRUZ
October 12 I refer you back to your own letter section over the past month to remind you of how many Americans in this area (not to mention the tens of thousands outside Santa Cruz) who find George W.s leadership to be anything but exemplary. While your editorial board, as well as many other citizens, may support the presidents actions, there are quite a few of us who do not believe in the use of violence to combat violence, and were hoping for a more thoughtful, intelligent, measured response from our countrys (elected) leader. LOLLY BELANGER FELTON
October 10 While we are still tender from the blow struck recently in our country, if anyone is moved in any way to look more closely at the issue of how we often respond to a pregnancy that is seemingly desperately unsupportable, I hope we can at this time do something a daily prayer for the mothers and their unborn babies, a contribution of money, clothes or time to groups currently serving those looking for an alternative to abortion, a prayer for those seeking healing from an abortion in their lives, to save innocent lives and at the same time heal our country of this ongoing wound. ANN HORTON BOULDER CREEK
October 10 Ive heard often "I dont want us to go to war, but what else can we do?" (One might ask the Israelis how effective their use of military vengeance has been in quelling the Intifada or gaining a lasting peace?) We were given the limited choice, false choice, of doing nothing or bombing the Afghan people, when there were an array of choices from bombing to the involvement of the World Court, U.N.-lead efforts, etc. Why use military methods for a criminal act? So far, the only accounting that evidence leads directly to bin Laden comes from the junior senator from Great Britain, Tony Blair. Even if it does lead to bin Laden, why are we killing and displacing Afghans? (The "evidence" is really for political cover of certain partners, including Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.) Bombing Afghanistan means taking out infrastructures power facilities to hospitals, water treatment facilities, etc.; this is happening six weeks before winter sets in in the high plateau thats Afghanistan. My father, during World War II, witnessed German occupational forces in Greece burn his entire village just before winter set in. It left them with no possibility of rebuilding in time, and food stores gone with the village. He rarely speaks about this horror, but you hear it in his voice some 60 years later. You dont have to pierce a body with shrapnel or crush it under concrete to kill and maim. The conditions created by war do that quite well. As Noam Chomsky said about the Vietnam War, "The war is the war crime." ALEC STOURAS SCOTTS VALLEY
October 10 STEPHANIE SIDDEN APTOS
October 10 As a former city planner, it is hard to believe the two towers, built like fence posts, would be constructed today. They were simply too tall and vulnerable. We can expect a tower to collapse after two collisions, but the collapse of both towers after only one collision by a jetliner is inexcusable and should be investigated. Didnt the planners foresee the possibility that if they built a skyscraper into the clouds, that a Boeing 747 filled with jet fuel would some day smash into it? City planners should have required these buildings to withstand at least one collision. Years ago, the Empire State Building remained standing after a World War II bomber slammed into it. Why werent the same building standards applied to the World Trade Center? Sure, it would have added to the cost of construction, but it would have allowed at least half of the estimated 5,000 people now missing to be with their families today. Some say the towers should be rebuilt. This is nonsense. It would be like repeating the original design of the Titanic. We must accept the fact that terrorism will be with us for many years, and like you, I do not wish to see this tragedy repeated. ROBERT CARO APTOS
October 15 There are so many complexities, it is hard to keep them straight. Weve known for a long time that bin Laden and his crew are financed by Saudi Arabian money. The Saudis were also most uncooperative after our servicemen were killed in a building blast, but we want their oil so we still call them allies. We permit Iraqi children to die for want of medical supplies while Saddam Hussein remains healthy. His demise, you see, might lead to an unstable situation in Iraq, and they too have oil. Besides, we supplied him his weapons when he was fighting Iran, just as we trained and armed the Taliban when they were our "Cold War allies." Careful, slow, considered thought doesnt appeal to our quick-to-fight-back, beat-em-to-a-pulp politicians; it is so undramatic to thoroughly discuss, analyze and strategize. But until we learn to use our brains instead of our brawn, there will be no peace and no security. MARILYN ELMAN SANTA CRUZ
October 15 More than $3.9 million of the general fund goes to community programs which provide essential health and human services to our local community. Countless other nonprofit agencies are funded under the Health Services Agency and other county contracts as well. These agencies provide an important safety net for those who face economic hardship and need support in the form of medical and dental care, food and shelter services, low-cost counseling, support for seniors, etc. The clients we serve arent strangers, but the neighbor next door; a senior citizen who, without the help of Meals on Wheels, wouldnt be able to continue living at his own home; or the woman across the street recently diagnosed with cancer who has found advocacy and support through the help of WomenCARE. These services are part of what make Santa Cruz County a healthy and safe place to live. Without the utility tax, funding for these services could be revoked. Although the county community programs funding only makes up 5.4 percent of the agencies total budgets, that 5.4 percent means a lot in the budget of a nonprofit. It could mean the difference between keeping a counselor on the Suicide Prevention Hotline through the night to help your child, or assuming that your child, or any child, will never face that need and therefore those counselors arent necessary. We, of the Human Care Alliance, believe these services arent extraneous, but vital to the health of our community. We hope youll agree that saving the utility tax is a small price to pay for the number of quality services available to you and your family. LAURA MARCUS HUMAN CARE ALLIANCE
October 15 While this is definitely an important and complex matter which demands much awareness and consideration, we cannot allow it to overshadow all the other important current issues we used to hear about in the news. The campaign for renewable energy sources and the rapidly developing fuel-cell technology, for instance, could play a very large part in solving our current energy crisis. This is good news. People might like to hear this, as a counterweight to the predominantly grim headlines. The tragedy and our "new war" are immediate and pressing concerns, and the faces of Osama bin Laden and other suspected terrorists are handy and appropriate ones on which to pin our anger, grief and fear. But to ignore environmental concerns which are just as pressing now as they were before our world changed so abruptly is to invite a tragedy of a far greater scale, one that will leave the entire planet mourning. And the faces that we will have to pin the blame on will be our own. KEN GUENTHER SANTA CRUZ
|
||||||||
|
Marketplace
Place an Ad
Find a Job
Find a Car
Find a Home
Find a Rental
Find a Business
Find Stuff
Get Grocery Coupons
View Today's Ads
Special Sections
Newspaper in Education
Home & Garden
Homework Help
SantaCruz PHOTOGALLERY
Sentinel Triathlon
Special Projects
EntertainmentCommunitySponsored Links
Alternative Cancer Treatment Clinic
Vacation Home Rentals
Bridesmaid Dresses
Magic Love Spells
Diamond engagement rings
Moving Companies
Aupairs & nannies available
Personal Loan
Moving Companies Directory
Registro de Dominios
Diamond Rings
Heat Press
Chrysler
Reverse Osmosis Water Softener
Personal Loan
World Travel
Attorney Finder Lawyer Search
|